Archive for November 2007

YouTube.com Ads Spending on Google

If YouTube.com was going to continue Ads Spending on Google, what would be the cost for such advertisement and how much visitors would they get?

Youtube.com

Daily Ad Budget: $41.02k – $65.92k +$2.61k (5.13 %)
Total Clicks/Day: 115k – 145k
Avg. Ad Position: 1.7 -0.02 (-0.90 %)
Avg. Cost/Click: $0.32 – $1.25 -$0.03 (-7.51 %)
Avg. Ad Competitors: 8.1 -0.99 (-10.93 %)
Avg. Clicks/Day: 127 – 202 -685 (-81.08 %)
Avg. Ad Percentile: 79.17 % -0.02 (-2.59 %)

Online Since: Jan-0001
Organic Results (280754)
RankSearch Term
1bill plympton oscar
1billy cobham stratus
1birger king
1black girls
1black ice poetry
1black horse and the cherry tree
1blanca nieves
1blaze of glory
1blondie atomic video
1blondie atomic

Advertisements (2012)
RankSearch Term
11.312
11thing video
12001audio video
12005super bowl commercials
12005superbowl commercials
12008 presidential candidates
122 short films
124 hour party people movie
12dtv clips
14×4 videos
Top Organic Competitors (1000)
imdb.com
wikipedia.org
myspace.com
cduniverse.com
last.fm
amazon.com
yahoo.com
blogspot.com
mp3.com
lyricsdownload.com
answers.com
tv.com
rhapsody.com
lyricsandsongs.com
flickr.com
sing365.com
geocities.com
artistdirect.com
lyrics007.com
google.com

Top Ad Competitors (64)
chrisvitarello.com
ask.com
alphagenesisinc.com
liberalsmustdie.com
onlygm.com
toseeka.com
primaterescue.org
rubylane.com
unicefusa.org
ainaworld.org
music-jobs.com
awf.org
filmschools.com
giftapolis.com
whoisbenjaminstove.com
collegeboard.com
kunaki.com
pastplay.com
biglemonreviews.com
newmoviearchive.com
Categories (5)
Arts > Music > Bands and Artists > G > Guerra, Juan Luis
Arts > Video > Directories
World > Esperanto > Domo
World > Esperanto > Kulturo > Kino
World > Esperanto > Regiona > Azio > -àªinio

.gov Accessible website SEO Touch

I worked in the past 2002 with www.pti.org for some e-government services but none of the counties knew that they could deliver more in term of qualitative information if they had better accessible websites. We are in 2007, Oh Cool Wake up.

E-Government Reauthorization Act of 2007 (Introduced in Senate)
Sources: http://www.loc.gov

S 2321 IS

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. 2321
To amend the E-Government Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-347) to reauthorize appropriations, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

November 7, 2007
Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. CARPER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

——————————————————————————–

A BILL
To amend the E-Government Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-347) to reauthorize appropriations, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `E-Government Reauthorization Act of 2007′.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

(a) In General- The E-Government Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-347) is amended–

(1) in section 204(b), by striking `2007′ and inserting `2012′;

(2) in section 207(g)(5)(B), by striking `and 2007′ and inserting `through 2012′;

(3) in section 213(h)(3), by striking `2007′ and inserting `2012′;

(4) in section 216(f), by striking `2007′ and inserting `2012′; and

(5) in section 401, by striking `2007′ and inserting `2012′.

(b) Information Security- Section 3548 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by striking `2007′ and inserting `2012′.

(c) E-Government Fund- Section 3604(g)(1)(E) of title 44, United States Code, is amended by striking `fiscal year 2007′ and inserting `fiscal years 2007 through 2012′.

(d) Information Technology Exchange Program- Section 3702(d) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking `the end of the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this chapter’ and inserting `September 31, 2012′.

(e) Computer Standards Program- Section 20(f) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278g-3) is amended by striking `2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007′ and inserting `2003 through 2012′.

SEC. 3. BEST PRACTICES FOR PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENTS.

Section 208(b)(3) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) is amended–

(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking `and’ at the end;

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period and inserting `; and’; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

`(D) develop best practices for agencies to follow in conducting privacy impact assessments.’.

SEC. 4. IMPROVING SEARCHES OF GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS ON THE WORLDWIDE WEB.

(a) Findings- Congress finds that–

(1) members of the public and governments commonly rely on commercial search engines to locate relevant information on the worldwide web, including information made available by government agencies; and

(2) some Federal agencies have not taken actions to make all of the information available through their websites readily accessible to commercial search engines.

(b) Searchability of Government Websites- Section 207(f) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:

`(4) SEARCHABILITY OF GOVERNMENT WEBSITES-

`(A) FUNCTIONS OF THE DIRECTOR-

`(i) GUIDELINES- Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the E-Government Reauthorization Act of 2007, the Director shall promulgate guidance and best practices to ensure that publicly available online Federal Government information and services are made more accessible to external search capabilities, including commercial and governmental search capabilities. The guidance and best practices shall include guidelines for each agency to test the accessibility of the websites of that agency to external search capabilities.

`(ii) REVIEW- The Director shall ensure periodic review of any guidance and best practices promulgated under clause (i) to ensure that the guidance and best practices are consistent with any advances made in information technology.

`(iii) REPORTS- The Director shall report annually to Congress, through the report established under section 3606 of title 44, United States Code, on–

`(I) the progress of agencies with the guidance promulgated under clause (i); and

`(II) the results of the testing by agencies.

`(B) AGENCY FUNCTIONS-

`(i) COMPLIANCE- Effective on and after 2 years after the date of enactment of the E-Government Reauthorization Act of 2007, each agency shall ensure compliance with any guidance promulgated under subparagraph (A).

`(ii) REPORTS- Each agency shall report annually to the Director, in the report established under section 202(g), on–

`(I) the use of best practices and progress of that agency with the guidance promulgated under subparagraph (A); and

`(II) the results of the testing by that agency.’.

SEC. 5. PROVIDING AGENCY E-GOVERNMENT REPORTS TO CONGRESS.

Section 3606(b) of title 44, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:

`(1) the reports submitted by agencies to the Director under section 202(g) of the E-Government Act of 2002, and a summary of the information reported by the agencies;’.

——————————————————————————–

THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO
Next Hit Forward New Bills Search
Prev Hit Back HomePage
Hit List Best Sections Help
Contents Display

Extreme Sports Clip Wingsuite mountain swoop

My next mission in life!!! Extreme Sports Clip Wingsuite mountain swoop

Give Before You Receive

Articles should give out plenty of valuable tips and information before you get around to asking folks to join your affiliate program. One very effective way of doing this is to create a regular ezine, and to ask people who are interested in getting more information to subscribe to it.

This will give you an opportunity to communicate regularly with them. Research has proven time and time again that most people will not buy anything on the first encounter. They would rather purchase from somebody whom they have become familiar with. Your regular ezine will cause your prospects to become very familiar with you and your company. The chances of them joining your affiliate programs will be much higher.

Facebook.co.uk Fraud Risk On Facebook MySpace

Fraud Risk On Facebook And MySpace + You should be carefull about your mortgage and college loans:
Last Edited: Sunday, 11 Nov 2007, 10:30 PM PST
Created: Sunday, 11 Nov 2007, 9:00 PM PST

Click Here

Sophisticated and organised criminals throughout the UK are routinely stealing the identities of those who post private information on social networking sites.

According to the financial website fool.co.uk, as many as one in three Facebook and MySpace users are virtually giving away their IDs to those keen on using it for illegal purposes.

Most “personal profiles” contain enough detail for a fraudster to begin the trawl for confidential information that can eventually allow them to pretend to be someone else, possibly you.

Dawn Telfer is one of thousands of people across the country who has had their identity stolen from the internet.

Dawn missed seeing her friends and work colleagues while on maternity leave. Discovering social networking sites gave her the ability to stay in touch.

Most of the websites insist on certain personal details before they will allow you to set up an account with them.

She had to provide private information such as “full” name, address, phone number, email and date of birth, much of which went onto her online profile.

It ended up costing her ??6,000 when someone stole her identity after reading about her on MySpace.

“They were able to contact my bank and set up two overdrafts in my name then transfer the money out,” said Dawn.

“The bank told me that they would only refund the money if I could prove the transfer was fraudulent. You try proving that you haven’t made an online transfer. During the months they investigated, they froze my bank account!”

Tony Neate from Get Safe Online told Sky News: “You should only post information on these sites that you would be happy to give a complete stranger at a bus stop.

“80% of internet users now have anti-virus and firewall software protecting their computers. That’s good, but now they now have to learn about the new risks associated with social networking sites. The vast majority are simply playing into the hands of those who can steal their identity.”

Last year, ??30 billion was spent online in the UK alone. Organised criminals have worked out that the virtual world is where they need to target their efforts.

Having someone steal an identity has become too easy if we don’t protect our personal information.

“The identity thief doesn’t necessarily find all the information he needs from a social networking site, but a full profile posted by someone who has been indiscreet can provide enough for him to go digging on other websites,” says Tom Ilube from Garlick, an organisation set up to help protect online identities.

He says identity thieves have become incredibly sophisticated.

Say one has managed to use your personal information to order a credit card in your name. The challenge would then be to get hold of that card that is bound to be sent to your home address.

Armed with your confidential personal details, Tom Ilube says thieves now use that information to access the Royal Mail online redirection service.

They could have all your post including the credit card sent to another house, perhaps one that is unoccupied.

Bingo – someone is going shopping with money for which you are liable.

Dawn Telfer has now had the stolen ??6,000 refunded by the bank. Her indiscretion online nearly cost her more than just cash she didn’t have.

“With all the stress, I ended up in hospital with high blood pressure and even had to have my baby six weeks early because the doctors were becoming worried my condition could threaten both of us.”

All this from being too open about herself online.