Dr. Google and the US Health Search Market:

* How systematic is health search behavior, and how loyal are online users to health sites?
* To what degree is the trustworthiness of health content more important to users than its relevance?
* How will health search behavior and adoption of health search engines likely evolve?
* How can advertisers, publishers, and search engines most effectively leverage health search behavior?

Landscape: Loyalty to Health Sites Relatively Low, with Relevance of Health Content More Important than Trustworthiness
Outlook: Health Search Engine Adoption Will Grow Among Power Health Users
Mandate: SEM Must Take Priority Among Health Advertisers and Publishers Through 2008

First Google HEALTH screenshots from Blogoscoped and our friend Philipp.

We know consumers looking for health information turn to search engines — but how do they decide what to click? Advertisers continue to try to understand how online users search and find health information. Jupiter Research’s new US Health Consumer Study 2007 takes us one step closer to understanding how consumers search for health information. The study’s overarching theme: relevance drives clicks. Four times as many consumers who used a search engine for health info clicked on a result because it was relevant, compared to others who click because the link was to a trusted source. And fully 65% of searchers clicked because the text was most relevant to their query. In addition, the study found that people seeking health information show no bias against sponsored results (versus natural results).

New York Times with Adam Bosworth

Based on this research, Jupiter recommends that advertisers leverage search engine optimization and paid search with a focus on content relevance. Advertisers should continue to optimize content for search engines.

It is too soon to know whether either Google or Microsoft will make real headway. Health care, experts note, is a field where policy, regulation and entrenched interests tend to slow the pace of change, and technology companies have a history of losing patience.

And for most people, typing an ailment into a Web search engine is very different from entrusting a corporate titan with personal information about their health.

Google and Microsoft recognize the obstacles, and they concede that changing health care will take time. But the companies see the potential in attracting a large audience for health-related advertising and services. And both companies bring formidable advantages to the consumer market for such technology.

Microsoft's software animates more than 90 percent of all personal computers, while Google is the default starting point for most health searches. And people are increasingly turning to their computers and the Web for health information and advice. A Harris poll, published last month, found that 52 percent of adults sometimes or frequently go to the Web for health information, up from 29 percent in 2001.

If the efforts of the two big companies gain momentum over time, that promises to accelerate a shift in power to consumers in health care, just as Internet technology has done in other industries.

Today, about 20 percent of the nation's patient population have computerized records — rather than paper ones — and the Bush administration has pushed the health care industry to speed up the switch to electronic formats. But these records still tend to be controlled by doctors, hospitals or insurers. A patient moves to another state, for example, but the record usually stays.

The Google and Microsoft initiatives would give much more control to individuals, a trend many health experts see as inevitable. “Patients will ultimately be the stewards of their own information,� said John D. Halamka, a doctor and the chief information officer of the Harvard Medical School.

Already the Web is allowing people to take a more activist approach to health. According to the Harris survey, 58 percent of people who look online for health information discussed what they found with their doctors in the last year.

It is common these days, Dr. Halamka said, for a patient to come in carrying a pile of Web page printouts. “The doctor is becoming a knowledge navigator,� he said. “In the future, health care will be a much more collaborative process between patients and doctors.�

Microsoft and Google are hoping this will lead people to seek more control over their own health records, using tools the companies will provide. Neither company will discuss their plans in detail. But Microsoft's consumer-oriented effort is scheduled to be announced this fall, while Google's has been delayed and will probably not be introduced until next year, according to people who have been briefed on the companies' plans.

A prototype of Google Health, which the company has shown to health professionals and advisers, makes the consumer focus clear. The welcome page reads, “At Google, we feel patients should be in charge of their health information, and they should be able to grant their health care providers, family members, or whomever they choose, access to this information. Google Health was developed to meet this need.�

A presentation of screen images from the prototype — which two people who received it showed to a reporter — then has 17 other Web pages including a “health profile� for medications, conditions and allergies; a personalized “health guide� for suggested treatments, drug interactions and diet and exercise regimens; pages for receiving reminder messages to get prescription refills or visit a doctor; and directories of nearby doctors.

Google executives would not comment on the prototype, other than to say the company plans to experiment and see what people want. “We'll make mistakes and it will be a long-range march,� said Adam Bosworth, a vice president of engineering and leader of the health team. “But it's also true that some of what we're doing is expensive, and for Google it's not.�

At Microsoft, the long-term goal is similarly ambitious. “It will take grand scale to solve these problems like the data storage, software and networking needed to handle vast amounts of personal health and medical information,� said Steve Shihadeh, general manager of Microsoft's health solutions group. “So there are not many companies that can do this.�

This year, Microsoft bought a start-up, Medstory, whose search software is tailored for health information, and last year bought a company that makes software for retrieving and displaying patient information in hospitals. Microsoft software is already used in hospitals, clinical laboratories and doctors' offices, and, Mr. Shihadeh noted, the three most popular health record systems in doctors' offices are built with Microsoft software and programming tools.

Microsoft will not disclose its product plans, but according to people working with the company the consumer effort will include online offerings as well as software to find, retrieve and store personal health information on personal computers, cellphones and other kinds of digital devices — perhaps even a wristwatch with wireless Internet links some day.

Mr. Shihadeh declined to discuss specifics, but said, “We're building a broad consumer health platform, and we view this challenge as far bigger than a personal health record, which is just scratching the surface.�

Yet personal health records promise to be a thorny challenge for practical and privacy reasons. To be most useful, a consumer-controlled record would include medical and treatment records from doctors, hospitals, insurers and laboratories. Under federal law, people can request and receive their personal health data within 90 days. But the process is complicated, and the replies typically come on paper, as photocopies or faxes.

The efficient way would be for that data to be sent over the Internet into a person's digital health record. But that would require partnerships and trust between health care providers and insurers and the digital record-keepers.

Privacy concerns are another big obstacle, as both companies acknowledge. Most likely, they say, trust will build slowly, and the online records will include as much or as little personal information as users are comfortable divulging.

A person might start, for example, by typing in age, gender and a condition, like diabetes, as a way to find more personalized health information. If a person creates a personal health record and later has second thoughts, a simple mouse click should erase it. The promise, the companies say, will be complete consumer control.

There are plenty of competitors these days in online health records and information from start-ups like Revolution Health, headed by AOL's founder, Stephen M. Case, and thriving profit-makers led by WebMD.

Potential rivals are not underestimating the two technology giants. But the smaller companies have the advantage of being focused entirely on health, and some have been around for years. WebMD, for example, traces its lineage to Healtheon, a fallen star of the dot-com era, founded by the Netscape billionaire Jim Clark.

Google and Microsoft are great companies, said Wayne T. Gattinella, WebMD's chief executive, but “that doesn't mean they will be expert in a specific area like health.�

Specialized health search engines — notably Healthline — are gaining ground and adding partners. AOL recently began using Healthline for searches on its health pages, even though Google is a close partner.

Still, 58 percent of people seeking health information online begin with a general search engine, according to a recent Jupiter Research report, and Google dominates the field. “Google is the entry point for most health search, and that is a huge advantage,� said Monique Levy, a Jupiter analyst.

Indeed, it is the market reach and deep pockets that Google and Microsoft can bring to consumer health information that intrigues medical experts, and has lured recruits. Dr. Roni Zeiger, a graduate of Stanford's School of Medicine, a medical informatics researcher and a former primary care doctor, joined Google last year. The 36-year-old, who still sees patients some evenings and weekends at a nearby clinic, said, “At Google, I can use my expertise and knowledge to potentially help millions of people each day.�

Random Posts

• July 15, 2006 -- Top 100 Google Music Videos
• January 18, 2008 -- Scrabulous says goodbye to Facebook users
• March 5, 2007 -- Poker en ligne
• October 5, 2009 -- Google wave Invitations
• March 14, 2009 -- It is not easy beeing sick but you should fight it
• December 25, 2006 -- Santa Has finished his deliveries on Google Earth
• July 29, 2008 -- Go Tell your MAMA to vote for OBAMA

I know that you had a great site with English content and you were ranking Top 10 in Google.de .se .fr .ca .dk .be(local) for a specific term. But now you have added some new languages such as Japanese, French, German Swedish, Danish, Arabic, Russian.

What would you think should happen for your Google positioning?
Will you keep the same Google ranking or would you lose it?

Actually Google had a LocalScore Patent since 2001 named Ranking search results by reranking the results based on local inter-connectivity by Krishna Bharat

Rethink your Search Engine Optimization strategy when initiated to add new languages for your site.

A search engine for searching a corpus improves the relevancy of the results by refining a standard relevancy score based on the interconnectivity of the initially returned set of documents. The search engine obtains an initial set of relevant documents by matching a user’s search terms to an index of a corpus. A re-ranking component in the search engine then refines the initially returned document rankings so that documents that are frequently cited in the initial set of relevant documents are preferred over documents that are less frequently cited within the initial set.

Random Posts

• May 13, 2006 -- Adam Lasnik Search Evangelist at Google joins Matt Cutts
• August 17, 2007 -- Defend Google Proxy Hacking
• July 8, 2008 -- Viva Chihuahuas
• November 28, 2009 -- Not Nice at all by Hackers
• June 19, 2008 -- LG Black Label Secret Portable Indestructible by LG Secret Mobile
• September 24, 2007 -- Online Video Marketing Consultants
• February 7, 2010 -- Google + NSA to help it ward off cyber attacks

Google Sandbox
Google -30
Google Bombing
Google Bowling
Google Skiing
Google Supplemental Results SERPS
Google Duplicate Content Filter
Google Ommitted search results Filter
Google Domain name and registrar Age Filter
Google Trust Rank Filter
Links.htm .php .html .jsp .asp page Filter
Reciprocal Link Filter
Redirection Filters from Spammed forums + wordpress + plone wiki and any other free CMS
Link Farming Filter
Coop Citation Links Filter
Thousands of incoming links at once Filter
Thousands of pages at once Filter
Broken Links and error Filters
.exe stand alone Filter
Page Load Time Filter
A surplus of optimization Filter
Keyword bubbles and stuffing Filter
Repeated Meta Tags Filter
Automated Google and any other search query Filter
IP Class Filter
Google Toolbar Filter
CTR Click through in SERPS Filter
Traffic Filter – spam emails etc…

Random Posts

• December 3, 2009 -- Google to lose some weight
• October 3, 2007 -- Les Déterminants de confiance et d'utilisabilité des internautes face aux services e-santé en Europe
• March 19, 2010 -- Patience is a virtue but
• February 27, 2010 -- Tsunami warning in Hawaii after Chile
• October 10, 2009 -- Windows Live cloning of FACEBOOK kicking Google Wave?
• January 18, 2008 -- Scrabulous says goodbye to Facebook users
• August 13, 2008 -- BLOG ACTION DAY 2008 POVERTY

What’s wrong with Google filter ? How come NotaryLaw.com gets best positions on Google’s results when searching for long tail keyword using free internet poker, online poker site etc… ?

Anyone to answer my question ?

Random Posts

• April 22, 2007 -- Online Identity When Googling you
• January 26, 2008 -- www.FaceBook.com XSS Vulnerability Scanner
• January 25, 2008 -- facebook friends at online party
• May 7, 2007 -- Google baby mentioned on BBC
• May 14, 2006 -- Googleism
• March 8, 2010 -- Re:EPT Berlin Robbed by 6 armed men, live stream …
• July 11, 2006 -- Google Building Huge Research Center in Michigan